Is the Nikki Haley incident fair turnaround?


Just My Opinion Add comments

  • Font Size
  • Make Text Smaller
  • Make Text Larger

Ok, I’d be the first to admit that a gentleman ain’t supposed to kiss and tell. But I’ve gotten kinda tired of all the folks – mostly Republicans – rushing to the defense of S.C. gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley.

In case you’ve been on Mars, Haley is the married mother of two who’s running to win the GOP nomination to succeed Gov. Mark “Appalachian Trail” Sandford. Most notably, perhaps, two men stepped forward in the waning days of the primary race to allege that they knew Mrs. Haley – biblically speaking – at a time when her husband was said to have been away serving in the military.

No less than Sara Palin has rushed to Haley’s defense. And more recently, syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker implied that Haley’s accusers were somehow less than masculine for flapping their gums.

“...what’s with all these kissy-boys spilling the beans on their paramours,” she asked. “Whither chivalry? Whither, alas, manliness?”

I understand the consternation these women must be feeling, but men have been dealing with... err, indiscreet mistakes ... since time immemorial.

No one stepped up to defend Tiger Woods – except, perhaps, Charles Barkley -- when every Vegas bleached-blond who ever slung hash rushed to claim her 15 minutes of infamy. And what about the numerous “bimbo eruptions” of Bill Clinton?

As I said, history is replete with powerful men brought low by women who couldn’t keep quiet.

As for Mrs. Haley, even if the alleged affairs actually happened, the two S.C. clods should be ashamed for violating her trust. But on the other hand, I find it amusing – even liberating – to see the scarlet pumps finally on the other feet.

 

Other Ways to Share

Discussions and Submission Agreement

Report Abusive/Inappropriate Comments

User Comments (4 Responses)
posted by
Miss Thang

Jun 8, 2010 at 1:09 PM

Got to agree on this one. Women want to be treated differently and here you go. We can't always give the woman the benefit of the doubt because the simple fact is there are plenty of skanks out there.

posted by
hbomb

Jun 9, 2010 at 7:27 AM

Hasn't SC had enough of being in the news for all the wrong reasons yet? I think Ms Hailey should have to answer for her alleged indiscretions the same as any other person seeking political office and I do believe that a man in her position would have had to answer for these allegations. As for men kissing and telling, that is so sad.

posted by
Beachgirl

Jun 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM

It's not fair play. To gloat over something that's sketchy and suspicious - one accuser is a former Bauer staffer, the other didn't pass or fail a lie detector test - is unfair to Haley. This is a different circumstance (so far, because things could change) than the ones with Woods and Clinton, and not a personal victory (yet) of turnabout.

posted by
Glenn Burkins, editor/publisher

Jun 10, 2010 at 1:36 PM

I wish "Beachgirl" had been more explicit in her comments. How are the Haley circumstances "different?" No one has proven yet that Bill or Tiger were intimate with the many women who claimed carnal knowledge. In other words, some of them may have been lying. The only thing different here is we have men making the claim against a woman.

Leave a Reply





On The Web

Happy birthday J. Dilla
A tribute to the late, great hip-hop producer responsible for some of the art form's greatest sounds.

Another insult for Michelle?
Republican Mike O'Neal reportedly forwarded an email making fun of the first lady's looks.

Qcity Jobs Search
Eg. Nurse

Los Angeles, CA



  
Charlotte Jobs by Category